Map your Playbooks to the Detections and How to Create Better Runbooks in an AI SOC

AI is transforming Security Operations Centers (SOCs). Unlike human analysts who rely on intuition, AI demands precise, structured instructions to act effectively. This shift has redefined how playbooks and runbooks are created and used in cybersecurity.

Key takeaways:

• AI SOC Playbooks: Detailed, step-by-step guides tailored for machines, focusing on exact triggers, data requirements, and escalation points.
• Mapping Playbooks to Detections: Link detection rules directly to playbooks for automated, accurate responses.
• Runbooks for AI SOCs: Tactical manuals for executing tasks, including error handling, API details, and validation steps.
• Analyst Roles: Analysts now focus on designing, testing, and refining AI-driven processes, ensuring smooth automation.

AI for SOC Automation: A Blueprint for the New world of Incident Response

How to Map Playbooks to Your Detections

Mapping playbooks to detection rules ensures your AI system responds accurately and efficiently when alerts are triggered. This process creates a direct link between detection events and the appropriate response actions.

Connect Playbooks to Detection Rules

Start by cataloging all detection rules across your security tools. These rules are often spread across various platforms, such as SIEM systems, endpoint detection tools, network monitoring solutions, and cloud security platforms.

For each detection rule, note the specific conditions that trigger an alert and the corresponding response actions. This includes identifying the data sources involved, the thresholds or patterns that generate alerts, and the details available when an alert is triggered.

Establish a direct connection between detection rule IDs and playbook identifiers. For example, Detection Rule #SOC-001 for "Suspicious PowerShell Activity" should automatically reference Playbook #PB-PowerShell-Response. This one-to-one mapping eliminates confusion and ensures your AI system knows exactly how to respond.

It's also essential to document the severity levels of alerts and how they align with different playbook actions. A critical alert might require immediate containment, while a low-level alert could be addressed with logging and monitoring. Clear instructions for severity-based actions ensure your AI system follows the correct response path. Once these mappings are in place, customize the playbooks to fit your specific environment.

Adapt Playbooks for Your Environment

Every organization has unique infrastructure and processes, so playbooks need to reflect those specifics. This includes custom data structures, field names, and integration points.

For instance, if your SIEM uses "src_host" instead of "source_hostname", make sure this is clearly documented in your playbooks. AI systems rely on precise field names and data locations to execute responses accurately.

Incorporate internal knowledge, such as user group roles, asset classifications, and status codes, to provide clarity for your AI system. Additionally, define escalation triggers tailored to your organization. Specify when alerts should be escalated, what information should be included in notifications, and which stakeholders need to be informed for different incident types.

Simulate alerts regularly to verify that your AI is executing the mapped playbooks correctly. Testing ensures that everything functions as intended and allows you to make adjustments as needed.

Use The Security Bulldog for Detection Mapping

Specialized tools like The Security Bulldog can simplify the process of mapping playbooks to detection rules. This AI-powered platform provides structured threat intelligence that integrates seamlessly with your detection framework.

The platform's MITRE ATT&CK integration organizes your detection rules using standardized tactics and techniques, ensuring comprehensive coverage across various attack vectors. It also uses semantic analysis to identify gaps in your playbooks, highlighting missing response procedures or areas that need improvement.

Custom feeds allow you to create intelligence streams tailored to your detection rules and playbook requirements. This ensures your AI system receives relevant threat context to support its response actions effectively.

With SOAR integration, The Security Bulldog can automate the execution of playbooks when specific detection rules are triggered. Additionally, its collaboration tools enable your security team to refine and update playbook mappings continuously, incorporating new threat intelligence and detection capabilities. This keeps your AI system prepared with the most up-to-date response procedures.

How to Write Playbooks for AI Systems

In an AI SOC (Security Operations Center), crafting playbooks requires a balance of technical accuracy and a deep understanding of your organization's unique environment. These playbooks must provide clear, structured instructions that align with your specific operational needs.

Key Parts of AI-Ready Playbooks

When creating an AI-ready playbook, it’s essential to include certain elements to ensure effective functionality:

• Trigger Conditions: Clearly define the exact conditions that activate the playbook. For example, a condition might be: "PowerShell execution contains base64 encoding, occurs in a non-standard directory, and happens within 5 minutes of access." Pair these triggers with decision trees that guide the AI through a logical series of yes/no criteria for handling incidents.
• Data Requirements: Specify precise data fields, formats, and locations to eliminate ambiguity. This ensures the AI doesn’t misinterpret or mishandle data due to inconsistencies or missing information.
• Success Criteria: Establish measurable benchmarks to determine if an action was completed successfully, needs to be retried, or requires escalation.
• Escalation Triggers: Define the exact conditions that call for human intervention. Use measurable benchmarks like the number of systems affected, specific user roles involved, or detection of particular attack techniques. This ensures the AI knows when to escalate issues to human analysts.

Add Team Knowledge and Context

Technical details alone aren’t enough. Incorporating your team’s expertise and organizational insights is crucial for building effective playbooks.

• Institutional Expertise: Leverage your team’s years of experience. This includes understanding the behavior of your log sources, identifying what constitutes normal activity in your environment, and recognizing patterns that are often false positives.
• Custom Field Mappings: Clearly document how different systems correlate data. For instance, if your SIEM logs use "user_name" but your identity management system uses "employee_id", provide explicit instructions for mapping and transforming this data.
• Environmental Context: Help the AI understand the importance of various assets and users. Develop classification schemes to identify critical systems, VIP users, and sensitive data repositories. Include guidance on handling incidents based on these classifications.
• Integration Details: Provide detailed documentation on how the AI interacts with your security tools. Include API endpoints, authentication methods, expected response formats, and error-handling protocols to ensure smooth integration.
• Historical Patterns: Share insights into common attack patterns, recurring false positives, and seasonal traffic variations. This historical knowledge can guide the AI in making more informed decisions.

Format Playbooks for Machine Reading

Once the technical and contextual elements are in place, structure your playbook to ensure it’s easily interpretable by machines.

• Structured Markup: Use clear headers, numbered steps, and standardized terminology to make the playbooks both machine-readable and easy for humans to update.
• JSON or YAML Formatting: These formats are ideal for structuring complex decision trees and data. They allow for nested logic that AI systems can process efficiently while remaining human-readable.
• Standardized Action Verbs: Use a consistent set of action verbs like "collect", "analyze", "block", "quarantine", and "escalate." Define what each action entails and specify required parameters to avoid confusion.
• Variable Definitions: Clearly mark and explain dynamic values such as timestamps, user names, or IP addresses. Consistent naming conventions and data type specifications help the system handle various data formats correctly.
• Conditional Logic: Implement consistent if-then-else structures to cover all possible outcomes, including edge cases. This prevents the AI from encountering scenarios it cannot process.
• Version Control: Use a systematic version control system to track changes, test updates, and roll back modifications when needed. Always ensure the AI references the most up-to-date, approved version of the playbook.

sbb-itb-9b7603c

How to Create Better Runbooks for AI SOCs

Creating effective runbooks for AI-driven Security Operations Centers (SOCs) requires a tailored approach that goes beyond traditional documentation. These runbooks act as the operational guideposts for automated systems, helping them navigate intricate security workflows while staying adaptable enough to manage unique scenarios.

Runbooks vs. Playbooks: What's the Difference?

Think of playbooks as the strategic blueprint - they outline the what and why behind decisions and responses. Runbooks, on the other hand, are the tactical manual - they provide the how with step-by-step instructions for executing specific tasks.

For instance, in an AI SOC setup, a playbook might identify suspicious PowerShell activity as a threat requiring immediate attention. The corresponding runbook would then break this down into actionable steps: precise commands, API calls, and procedures for collecting forensic evidence from the affected system.

The main distinction lies in detail and purpose. Runbooks focus on the nitty-gritty - tool configurations, command syntax, and error-handling protocols - ensuring AI systems can carry out tasks smoothly. This granular focus is what makes runbooks indispensable for execution.

Steps to Build AI SOC Runbooks

Building effective runbooks for an AI SOC involves crafting clear, actionable instructions that balance automation with human oversight. Here's how to get started:

• Break down complex tasks into simple, measurable steps with clear inputs, outputs, and criteria for success. For example, a malware analysis runbook might include stages like setting up a sandbox, submitting samples, collecting results, and generating reports.
• Specify details for every action, such as API endpoints, authentication tokens, timeout settings, and retry logic. Include data formats, field mappings, and transformation rules to ensure the AI system processes information correctly.
• Plan for errors by creating workflows for common failures. Document error codes, diagnostics, and recovery steps, and outline when the system should retry, escalate to a human analyst, or safely halt operations.
• Account for network and compliance factors by documenting your organization's network segmentation, access controls, and regulatory requirements that may influence automated actions.
• Add checkpoints to validate each step before moving forward. Include methods like log checks, system status verifications, and validation queries to confirm successful execution.
• Incorporate feedback loops to capture execution results and feed them back into the decision-making process. This helps the AI system adapt to real-time changes and improve over time.

How to Keep Runbooks Updated

Developing runbooks is just the beginning - keeping them accurate and relevant is an ongoing process. Here's how to ensure they stay up-to-date:

• Automate performance tracking to monitor execution success rates, failure trends, and completion times. Set alerts for drops in success rates or the emergence of new error patterns that signal the need for updates.
• Schedule regular reviews aligned with your change management processes. Monthly reviews can focus on technical accuracy, while quarterly reviews can assess whether runbooks align with evolving threats and business goals.
• Learn from incidents by documenting insights from security events. If human analysts override automated decisions or uncover new attack methods, update the relevant runbooks to reflect these findings.
• Stay ahead of tool and platform changes by monitoring updates to software, APIs, and infrastructure. Any modifications that could disrupt workflows should trigger a review of affected runbooks.
• Test runbooks in controlled environments to confirm they perform as intended. Use simulation setups or tabletop exercises to validate procedures without risking production systems.
• Implement version control for all changes, ensuring you can roll back to previous versions if needed. Keep a detailed record of changes, including the reasoning behind updates and the environments where they’re deployed.

Traditional vs AI SOC Playbooks: Key Differences

Switching from human-centered Security Operations Centers (SOCs) to AI-driven ones requires a complete overhaul in how playbooks are designed. Traditional playbooks acted as guides for human analysts, offering flexible instructions that relied on human judgment. On the other hand, AI SOC playbooks are detailed instruction sets tailored for machines to execute autonomously, leaving no room for ambiguity. This level of precision is essential for their functionality.

Human analysts can make assumptions or infer steps, but AI systems need every detail explicitly outlined. This includes specifying which APIs to call, the parameters to use, and how to handle unusual scenarios.

Traditional playbooks are written in natural language, often with implied context. AI playbooks, however, demand structured formats that machines can process, with clearly defined parameters. For example, where a traditional playbook might say, "escalate if necessary", an AI playbook must define the exact conditions for escalation, such as a risk score exceeding 85 or the detection of specific compromise indicators.

While traditional playbooks provide general guidance adaptable by analysts during execution, AI SOC playbooks must be tailored to the specific environment from the outset. This includes incorporating details like tool integrations, compliance rules, and field mappings.

Playbook Comparison Table

These distinctions underscore how AI-driven SOCs demand a fundamentally different approach to playbook design to meet their operational requirements.

Maintaining these playbooks also requires a shift in mindset. Traditional playbooks often fell out of date because analysts, overwhelmed with daily tasks, couldn't keep documentation current. With AI SOC playbooks, maintenance becomes essential - outdated instructions can disrupt automated workflows entirely.

Knowledge capture is another critical area. Traditional playbooks assumed analysts were familiar with internal systems, custom identifiers, and organizational data formats. AI systems, however, require these details to be explicitly embedded within the playbook to function effectively.

Lastly, the feedback loop differs significantly. Human analysts provide feedback informally through discussions and post-incident reviews. AI systems, by contrast, generate structured data on performance, success rates, and errors, enabling systematic analysis to refine and improve playbooks over time.

How SOC Analyst Roles Are Changing

The rise of AI-powered Security Operations Centers (SOCs) isn’t replacing security analysts - it’s redefining what they do. Instead of spending hours manually chasing alerts and sifting through logs, analysts are stepping into roles that involve designing, maintaining, and optimizing automated security processes.

New Analyst Responsibilities in AI SOCs

In this AI-driven environment, analysts are focusing more on training AI systems and shaping their architecture. Their responsibilities are shifting from being primarily reactive to creating detailed playbooks that guide AI through intricate security challenges.

One emerging skill is prompt engineering, which involves crafting clear and actionable instructions for AI systems to handle specific security incidents. This requires analysts to combine their deep knowledge of security with a programmer’s problem-solving approach - anticipating potential threats and creating decision frameworks for automated responses.

Another key area is documentation. Analysts are spending more time detailing custom tools, data mappings, and configurations tailored to their unique environments. This ensures AI systems can interpret data correctly, especially when working with tools like SIEMs. Quality assurance has also become a significant part of the job, as analysts regularly review AI performance, fine-tune automated decisions, and refine playbooks based on feedback.

Collaboration is evolving as well. Analysts are now working closely with data scientists and AI engineers to align detection algorithms and automation processes with their organization’s overall security goals.

These changing responsibilities naturally highlight the importance of having standardized tools for AI SOCs.

Getting Started with AI SOC Tools

For organizations venturing into AI SOCs, the first step is standardizing playbooks. Establish clear formats to document security workflows and define custom processes before bringing AI tools into the mix.

Starting small with pilot programs targeting high-volume, low-complexity alerts can help generate valuable training data for AI systems. This phased approach allows teams to test and refine their processes without overwhelming their operations.

When integrating tools, careful planning is essential. Map out your security ecosystem and identify which systems need API connections to ensure seamless communication between your SIEM, threat intelligence platforms, and ticketing systems.

Training is another critical piece. Analysts need to understand the limitations of AI and become comfortable reviewing and adjusting automated decisions rather than handling every task manually. This mindset shift is just as important as the technical skills required.

Measurement frameworks are also a must. By tracking metrics like time-to-detection, false positive rates, and analyst workload under current manual processes, organizations can better evaluate how AI improves efficiency and identify areas needing further refinement.

Finally, consider tools that allow for gradual automation instead of diving straight into full automation. This step-by-step approach keeps analysts involved in oversight, helping them build trust in AI systems while preparing for more complex, higher-risk scenarios down the line.

FAQs

How can AI SOCs keep playbooks up-to-date to address new threats and evolving technologies?

AI Security Operations Centers (SOCs) can stay ahead of threats by using automated threat intelligence and machine learning to continuously analyze and address new risks. Regular updates and testing of playbooks are key to keeping them effective, while integrating lessons learned from recent incidents helps fine-tune processes.

It's crucial to involve analysts who can offer context and tailored guidance for specific environments. Additionally, playbooks should be designed with flexible frameworks that allow for real-time updates as new vulnerabilities or attack methods emerge. This adaptability is vital for keeping up with the fast-evolving threat landscape.

How do AI SOC playbooks differ from traditional SOC playbooks, and what does this mean for security teams?

Traditional SOC playbooks are crafted with human analysts in mind. They rely on step-by-step instructions and often incorporate tribal knowledge - those informal, team-specific insights about systems and processes that aren’t always documented. These playbooks are meant to guide analysts through manual tasks, troubleshooting, and decision-making.

AI SOC playbooks, however, take a completely different approach. Built for automated systems and AI agents, these playbooks serve as guardrails for automation, focusing on custom detections and actions tailored to specific environments. Instead of human-centric details, they emphasize system-oriented instructions, such as interpreting custom data mappings, understanding log sources, and working with platform-specific IDs.

This evolution enables faster, more consistent responses through automation, but it shifts the responsibilities of security teams. Analysts now take on the role of AI workflow designers, crafting precise instructions and prompts to ensure these playbooks meet the unique requirements of their systems and environments.

How are security analysts adapting to AI-driven SOCs, and what new responsibilities do they have?

In an AI-powered SOC, security analysts are shifting away from traditional manual investigation tasks to roles that emphasize shaping and fine-tuning AI systems. A key part of their work involves developing and managing customized playbooks - guidelines that ensure AI tools operate in line with the specific requirements of their organization.

These analysts are also tasked with preserving essential tribal knowledge, such as decoding complex log data, interpreting custom IDs, and addressing detection nuances unique to their environment. By taking on the roles of architects and trainers for AI systems, they help improve detection accuracy and streamline responses, significantly cutting down on manual efforts.